Subscribe

Futures & Options World Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please seperate each email address with a semi-colon ';'


Ian Axe to lead LCH at critical time

23 February 2011

Read more: Ian Axe LCH Barclays EMEA SwapClear

LCH.Clearnet, the Anglo-French clearing house, announced on February 15 that Ian Axe would take over as its chief executive in April.

Last summer, Roger Liddell announced he was stepping down as head of LCH after four years. Axe is global head of operations and chief operating officer for EMEA at Barclays Capital.

“Ian has a broad background. He has built successful businesses, as well as run them,” said Jacques Aigrain, LCH.Clearnet’s chairman, when asked what Axe’s background in operations would offer the group. “He brings a hands-on experience in the clearing field from the users’ and clients’ perspective. It is this breadth, combined with his in-depth understanding of the financial sector, which will be of great service to the group in the coming years.”

Axe began his 17 year career in finance with UBS Warburg. He switched to financial services consulting with Booz Allen Hamilton, before joining Barclays in 2002. He became chief operating officer of South African investment bank Absa Capital in 2006, after Barclays bought a majority stake in its parent.

Axe worked on key projects at Barclays, including the formation of Barclays Wealth, the integration of Lehman Brothers and the $13.5bn sale of Barclays Global Investors to BlackRock in summer 2009.

Axe’s appointment comes at a critical time for LCH.Clearnet. Last summer, NYSE Liffe Euronext announced that it was dropping its long term contract and taking clearing in house. Weeks later, the London Stock Exchange said it was also reviewing its agreement with LCH, and its chief executive Xavier Rolet left the clearer’s board.

Opportunities ahead

Aigrain insisted such concerns were not new ones for Axe or the group. “The landscape in which we operate has been changing for some time,” he said. “The growth of the OTC markets over the last decade and the implications of legislative and regulatory reform will greatly influence our business.

“It is too early to say how the proposed exchange consolidation will pan out – however, concentration among the incumbents often leads to opportunities for other service providers. LCH.Clearnet will continue to build from its leadership position as an horizontal, multi-product classes clearer.”

Aigrain added that the firm was “very keen to progress with interoperability in cash equities, as we see it as a critical way to offer the equity market real choice in clearing.”

Any movement in that direction from European regulators could offer a valuable revenue stream for the group as it absorbs the loss of big exchange contracts – though many are sceptical on progress. “In Europe there is a push for interoperability, but the complexities of margining across numerous clearing organisations means we are unlikely to see any real progress in practice,” Hartmut Klein, former head of Eurex’s London office, now a derivatives consultant with Goodacre, said recently.

Nevertheless, Liddell argued when he announced his decision to step down: “We’re in a much stronger position than we were four years ago,” Liddell argued when he announced his decision to step down last summer. “We’re dominant in OTC interest rate swaps, which is where we wanted to be. That will be the focus for the next few years, and I believe we will remain dominant.” The firm is the market leader in interest rate swap clearing, with its SwapClear service housing some $229tr of swaps by notional principal – 40% of the market. The clearer is keen to expand its US business too, hiring more sales staff as it takes a tilt at buyside clearing


Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Poll

What concerns you most about the upcoming regulation changes?

Opportunity for regulatory arbitrage
12%
Impact on revenues
36%
Unnecessary complexity
10%
Workability of central clearing for OTC derivatives
11%
Workability of forcing complex derivatives onto exchanges
30%