Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Flash trading debate shows virtues of options market
18 December 2009
Regulatory debates are often so filled with misleading hype and special pleading that one despairs of any truth being found. The controversy over flash trading of options is a refreshing exception.
Read more:
[flash trading]
[flash orders]
[equity options]
[options trading]
[maker taker pricing]
[payment for order flow]
[SEC]
[CBOE]
[ISE]
The flash trading debate has shown the derivatives market in a good light.
Position papers arguing against the proposed ban on flash trading of options, signed by the CBOE’s Bill Brodsky, Michael Simon of ISE and the Boston Options Exchange’s Tony McCormick, have dissected this issue with forensic precision.
All are anxious to avoid a regulatory clampdown that would hurt their interests, and which they maintain would also damage the market as a whole. Not just market intermediaries would suffer, they claim, but also end users of derivatives – in this case, retail investors.
So far, so familiar. Every time a law or regulation threatens companies’ freedom to make money, these are the terms in which they couch their opposition.
Strident protests of this kind were heard all summer in the US, over CFTC chairman Gary Gensler’s plans to impose position limits on commodity traders, especially in energy.
To continue reading this article please subscribe or take a free trial to FOW.
Already have an account?
Subscribe
Subscribers have unlimited access to all current and archive content. Start your
subscription today - click on the button below.
Free trial
Taking a free trial will give you access to the current issue for two weeks (excluding
some surveys and articles). Start your free trial today.