Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
When is a business not real?
16 September 2009
Speculators in futures and options are a much bigger beast than they used to be, but are US regulators right to attack them? Derivative markets depend on this capital, argues Philip McBride Johnson.
Speculators in futures and options are a much bigger beast than they used to be, but are US regulators right to attack them? Derivative markets depend on this capital, argues Philip McBride Johnson, and if regulators try to classify some participants as less deserving than others, they may just end up tying themselves in knots. Various governments around the world allow futures and commodity options markets to exist, not as betting parlours, but because they constitute a privately funded insurance pool for people in occupations where some form of price risk arises naturally. If this risk strikes, the markets compensate them for their losses.
A very substantial part of that insurance pool is contributed by speculators willing to wager that the risk, after all, will not occur. As a result, the economic protections offered by derivatives markets could be defeated if speculation is curtailed too much. Yes, it is the...
You must be logged in to view this page. If you are already a registered user please log in. Alternatively, you can request a free trial or subscribe.
Already have an account?
Subscribe
Subscribers have unlimited access to all current and archive content. Start your
subscription today - click on the button below.
Free trial
Taking a free trial will give you access to the current issue for two weeks (excluding
some surveys and articles). Start your free trial today.