Northern Illinois District Court has granted a raft of
motions from TT and Espeed requesting that the other party
submit additional evidence in the patent case between the
The court has demanded that TT submit various documents,
including information about pending patents relevant to the
case and, "documents that sufficiently show when and under what
circumstances it conceived its invention and reduced it to
practice." TT was also told to submit documents explaining its
motivation in acquiring non-US patent WO 01/16852, which the
ruling said "may be relevant to defendant's prior art
This article is available exclusively to subscribers
Please log in to continue reading.
Not yet a subscriber?
Click here to take a free trial.
Already have an account? |
Please fill in your details below and a customer service representative will contact you.